VALIDATION INFRASTRUCTURE / MARITIME EO/IR PERCEPTION

Synthetic · surrogate · replay · validation

Validation infrastructure for maritime EO/IR perception.

Synthetic scenarios, surrogate captures, deterministic replay, and measurement-quality review for maritime autonomy and sensor-fusion teams.

For technical teams: generic seeker-like measurement schemas, GNC/test export paths, and fusion-policy comparison — non-operational validation infrastructure only.

Replay Console

Synthetic session A-17

Measurement quality timeline

Confidence

0.82

Dropout

4.1%

Disagreement

1.7 deg

Demo

Synthetic showcase and surrogate capture proof

The flagship demo is a 120-second synthetic maritime observation scenario showing EO/IR degradation, dropout, channel disagreement, fusion-policy behavior, severity-scored replay review, and report generation.

The same validation stack now accepts benign surrogate capture: real EO shoreline video → reviewed annotations → bearing/elevation measurements → replay review artifacts.

Primary artifact

Measurement quality timeline
Synthetic / non-operational
Measurement quality timeline

Shows how confidence, validity, and measurement gaps evolve over the 120-second synthetic observation scenario.

Channel comparison

EO/IIR bearing comparison
Synthetic / non-operational
EO/IIR bearing comparison

Compares EO/IIR channel estimates with fused measurements to surface channel disagreement and dropout periods.

Environment sweep

Maritime environment sweep
Synthetic / non-operational
Maritime environment sweep

Summarizes repeatable maritime-like environment effects across visibility, clutter, and observation conditions.

Policy analysis

Fusion policy summary
Synthetic / non-operational
Fusion policy summary

Highlights how fusion-policy behavior changes as channel confidence, validity, and disagreement shift.

Session evidence

Annotation preview
Synthetic / non-operational
Annotation preview

Shows synchronized synthetic annotations that connect frame-level evidence to telemetry replay and reports.

Different maritime-like observation conditions degrade EO and IIR channels differently. The platform quantifies how confidence, validity, fusion acceptance, and measurement gaps change across synthetic environments.

Recent milestones

Current technical status.

Implemented milestones

EO-only surrogate capture workflow: real shoreline video through annotations, measurements, and replay review

Capture session manager CLI for field-to-report surrogate workflows

Validation showcase with replay review, EO/IR availability, disagreement bursts, and scenario diff artifacts

Severity-based replay review with deterministic session bookmarks

Degraded maritime visibility scenario pack implemented

C++ observation-geometry foundation for future 3D validation workflows

Validation of degraded maritime EO/IIR observation conditions including fog, glare, clutter, dropout, and channel disagreement.

Focus areas

measurement qualitysurrogate capture QAreplay/reportingEO/IR observation geometrydegraded-visibility validation

Current stack

Python

QA, reporting, synthetic workflows, artifact generation

C++

geometry, observation modeling, future replay/runtime primitives

Next.js

website and report presentation

Validation showcase

Validation showcase

Degraded maritime EO/IIR observation scenarios are replayed as multichannel validation sessions, summarized with event timelines, channel availability, disagreement bursts, and scenario-to-scenario diff artifacts.

Synthetic / surrogate validation artifact

Replay event timeline

Summarizes declared replay event windows so reviewers can scan agreement, warning, and disagreement intervals quickly.

Replay event timeline

Synthetic / surrogate validation artifact

Channel state timeline

Shows EO/IIR availability transitions across the replay session without opening raw telemetry files.

Channel state timeline

Synthetic / surrogate validation artifact

Disagreement bursts

Highlights contiguous warning and disagreement intervals where channel offsets exceed validation thresholds.

Disagreement bursts

Synthetic / surrogate validation artifact

Scenario diff metrics

Compares disagreement, unavailable fraction, and azimuth-delta metrics between two degraded-visibility replay sessions.

Scenario diff metrics

Replay review

Severity-based replay review

The validation layer does not only generate plots. It scores replay severity, identifies the most important review moments, and creates deterministic bookmarks so engineers can jump directly to the parts of a session that need attention.

high disagreementScore 0.770 · Priority high

Recommended review focus

  • Inspect EO/IIR availability intervals and channel dropout timing.
  • Review warning intervals for offset drift before disagreement.
  • Review warning bursts even if sustained disagreement was absent.
  • Trace channel state transitions against event windows.

Top bookmarks

bm_0001

7.009.00 s

Channel dropout window

EO unavailable for 2.0 s during replay review.

bm_0002

0.002.00 s

Measurement gap window

Warning interval persisted for 2.0 s with potential measurement-gap risk.

bm_0003

2.006.50 s

Agreement warning burst

Agreement warning persisted for 4.5 s during offset drift.

Severity preview

Severity review preview
Synthetic / non-operational
Severity review preview

Static preview of session severity label, score, and recommended review focus.

Session bookmarks

Session bookmark preview
Synthetic / non-operational
Session bookmark preview

Top deterministic bookmarks exported from the validation showcase replay review.

Review cards

Review cards preview
Synthetic / non-operational
Review cards preview

Preview of replay event windows and review-card context from the exported showcase.

Showcase report

Showcase report preview
Synthetic / non-operational
Showcase report preview

Preview of scenario diff metrics from the validation showcase export.

Problem

Maritime perception needs repeatable evidence.

EO/IIR maritime perception degrades under visibility shifts, sea clutter, intermittent dropout, channel disagreement, and confidence uncertainty. Validation work needs controlled variation, traceable measurements, and reviewable artifacts that technical and business stakeholders can read.

Visibility loss

Sea clutter

Channel dropout

Confidence uncertainty

Platform

Capabilities for synthetic, surrogate, and replay validation.

Surrogate capture workflow

Package benign real-world EO/IR capture sessions, validate manifests, convert reviewed annotations into bearing/elevation measurements, and produce replay review artifacts.

EO/IR measurement validation

Compare EO/IR measurements against controlled references, uncertainty bands, and event annotations in synthetic and surrogate workflows.

Fusion-policy analysis

Evaluate confidence-weighted fusion policies under dropout, disagreement, clutter, and visibility shifts.

Maritime environment sweeps

Run repeatable scenario grids across sea state, haze, glint, range, and observation geometry.

Telemetry replay and reports

Use telemetry replay with synchronized plots, frame previews, annotations, and executive summaries.

Surrogate annotation-to-measurement workflow

Validate structured surrogate EO/IR packages, convert manual annotations into bearing/elevation measurements, and produce demo reports.

Seeker-like measurement replay

Replay generic bearing, confidence, validity, and channel-disagreement schemas suitable for V&V — not operational targeting software.

GNC and test-team export

Emit MATLAB-friendly tables and replay artifacts that fit guidance, navigation, and test analysis workflows.

Synthetic session pipeline

Move from manifest to annotations, measurements, fusion, comparison, replay, and report packages.

Pipeline

From session manifest to partner-ready report.

01

Session Manifest

02

Annotations

03

Measurements

04

EO/IIR Fusion

05

Policy Comparison

06

Replay

07

Reports

Use cases

Built for teams that need credible validation evidence.

Maritime autonomy and EO/IR perception teams

GNC and test analysis teams

Sensor fusion and payload R&D

Defense-tech prototyping and V&V teams

Roadmap

A staged path from visual demo to generalized validation core.

01

Synthetic showcase and validation artifacts

02

Surrogate EO/IR capture through measurement and replay review

03

Maritime environment sweeps and degraded-visibility packs

04

Capture session manager and field-to-report workflows

05

Generic 3D/6DOF validation core

ONE-PAGER

A concise technical brief for partners and investors.

The one-pager summarizes validation infrastructure for maritime EO/IR perception — synthetic and surrogate workflows, demo artifacts, seeker-like measurement replay, GNC/test export, roadmap, and scope boundaries for technical diligence and partner conversations.

A

Problem

Maritime autonomy and sensor-fusion teams lack repeatable validation infrastructure for EO/IR measurement quality. Experiments often live in ad hoc scripts and one-off plots — and partners ask whether the workflow handles real sensor capture too.

B

Platform

The platform provides validation infrastructure for maritime EO/IR perception: synthetic scenarios for controlled V&V, surrogate captures for real sensor texture, deterministic replay, fusion-policy analysis, seeker-like measurement schemas, GNC/test export, and visual reporting.

C

What the demo proves

  • Synthetic session-to-report pipeline
  • Surrogate EO capture through measurement and replay review
  • EO/IR measurement-quality analysis
  • Fusion-policy comparison
  • Severity-scored replay review and bookmarks
D

Current status

  • Working technical repo and public showcase
  • Synthetic and surrogate validation workflows
  • Real EO shoreline capture converted through the same pipeline
  • C++ observation geometry foundation
  • Python/C++/MATLAB-oriented review workflows
E

Near-term roadmap

  • Expanded surrogate EO/IR hardware capture (controlled, benign)
  • Harden partner-facing session schemas and capture session manager
  • Measurement-quality sensitivity sweeps
  • Partner POCs around seeker-like replay and GNC/test reporting
  • Generic 3D/6DOF validation core later
F

Boundaries

Non-operational validation infrastructure only. No weapon design, targeting, launch/deployment behavior, terminal attack logic, or operational engagement software.

Share the brief with technical partners, investors, and review teams that need a compact overview of the validation workflow.

Founder

Technical founder context.

Founder profile

Talha Isik

Founder, Euxine Labs

Computer Vision / Real-Time Systems / Maritime Autonomy

Location: Türkiye

Current focus

Validation infrastructure from synthetic V&V to surrogate capture

Computer vision and real-time systems engineer with experience in maritime autonomy, EO sensing, sensor fusion, embedded perception systems, and telemetry-heavy workflows. Previously worked on autonomous maritime perception and sports-tracking systems combining computer vision and radar telemetry.

Validation infrastructure for maritime EO/IR perception

Seeker-like measurement replay and fusion analysis

GNC/test export and telemetry replay

Synthetic and surrogate engineering review workflows

Scope

Benign and non-operational.

Benign, non-operational validation infrastructure only. The platform supports synthetic and surrogate EO/IR measurement replay, fusion-policy analysis, seeker-like schema validation, GNC/test export, and engineering review — not launch/deployment behavior, operational targeting, or fielded weapon software.

Contact

Contact Euxine Labs to request the one-pager or schedule a technical walkthrough.

Contact Euxine Labs